| Title | s element (strike) used for presentational purpose |
|---|---|
| Description | Presentational element strike where its presentation characteristic is purely decorative and conveys no meaning at all. |
| Creator | BenToWeb (evlach@…) |
| Rights | Copyright BenToWeb 2004-2007 |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2005-08-28 |
| Status | rejected QA |
Technologies are markup languages or data formats. If the technology is a markup language, “features” refers to elements and attributes.
XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition)
Feature: strike
(namespace: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml)
.
Technical specification: Font style elements .
Feature: s
(namespace: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml)
.
Technical specification: Font style elements .
The test case is intended to pass as strike and s elements presentation characteristics are purely decorative and convey no meaning at all.
(Test case "rejected QA" because it does not contain information or relationships conveyed through presentation.)
Check whether presentation tags has been used in order to convey information.
Three or more accessibility experts.
“Rules” refer to success criteria in WCAG 2.0, checkpoints in WCAG 1.0 and similar requirements.
The following success criterion is not applicable to this test case: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/Overview.html#content-structure-separation-programmatic.
The following success criterion is not applicable to this test case: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/Overview.html#content-structure-separation-programmatic.
The following success criterion is not applicable to this test case: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/Overview.html#content-structure-separation-programmatic.
Presentation tag has been used only for presentation.
This test case does not map to a WCAG 2.0 technique or failure.
The test case passes (line 11, column 106) the following success criterion: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/guidelines.html#content-structure-separation-programmatic.
The test case passes (line 20, column 106) the following success criterion: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/guidelines.html#content-structure-separation-programmatic.
The test case passes (line 32, column 106) the following success criterion: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/guidelines.html#content-structure-separation-programmatic.
Presentation tag has been used only for presentation.
This test case does not map to a WCAG 2.0 technique or failure.
Online version: sc1.3.1_l1_108.